Blog Home Return to Main Site info@bostonrealestate.net Home

Boston Condominium Report available
Posted on: Thursday, April 17, 2008

Filed Under: Boston Real Estate News

Recently broadcast by Tony Longo, this report created by Primetime Communities, a large New England based onsite sales and marketing firm, is a comprehensive downtown Boston condominium analysis.

This analytical overview entitled, “The Two Thousand Eight Prime Report: A comprehensive study of Boston’s Residential Market and Factors Which Impact Its Viability” overviews Massachusetts real estate sales, Boston real estate sales, and many of the Boston condo communities. Profiles on the new projects in Boston are excellent and for anyone looking to buy or sell in Boston this is a very nice piece to review. For questions on the article please post to the blog or email Info@BostonRealEstate.net and a quailfied REALTOR will be glad to help you.

Download the complete report by CLICKING HERE.

Boston is Top 6 Places to Buy a Home according to CNNMoney.com!
Posted on: Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Filed Under: Boston Real Estate News

CNNMoney.com just reported today their findings of “The 6 cities where home prices are likely to rise the most - or fall the least - in the next 12 months.” To view the report go HERE.

Boston fell as the 2nd area highlighted saying: One of the first places to experience the downturn, Beantown also appears to be among the first to rebound: In the last quarter of 2007, prices rose 1%.

This bodes well for those involved in the real estate market in Boston! Call ERA Boston Real Estate Group today at 617-262-1900 for more information on this report or for information on buying, selling, or renting in Boston.

Boston Common Magazine profiles the Top 5 Brokers of 2007
Posted on: Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Filed Under: Boston Real Estate News

Want to know who the best of the best is? Look no farther then ERA Boston Real Estate Group’s Michael Carucci. Profiled at the 5th ranking Broker in the entire Boston market. Michael says his success is derived by focusing in a specific area - Boston’s Back Bay and Beacon Hill markets. For over 25 years ERA Boston Real Estate Group has had it’s same location on the corner of Newbury Street and Hereford Street.

The relationships he has built over a quarter of a century have paid dividends. If you ask him today, even during a country-wide real estate slump, he is busier then ever.

To view the entire article click here.

Home sales in Northeast region Surge in March, 2008
Posted on: Monday, April 14, 2008

Filed Under: National Real Estate News

Regional Report: Northeast
by Realty Times Staff

RealEstateabc.com reported at the end of March that sales of existing homes in the US went up by 2.86 percent last month, from 4.89 million homes to 5.03 million homes.

The sharpest increase they found was in the Northeast region, which saw a jump of 11.25 percent for the month.

That is a really phenomenal increase for Northeastern states like Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York, where local agents are overall quite positive about their market.

Our market expert in Canton, Massachusetts, David Nelson, reports that 20 homes have sold in his area over the last few months and 17 others have gone under contract.

These numbers are up from last year, Nelson says, and there are still plenty of good buys to be had.

Our market experts for Fishkill, New York, Vincent and Roberta Lario, also have some good news for their area.

They report that though sales are down in surrounding areas, they have actually seen an increase in sales and home price and their area, where the average home price is $368,000.

And despite the unusually high prices, the Larios also report a large number of homes for sale in their market.

And lastly to Kinnelon, New Jersey, where market expert Anne Fisher also has some good news.

Unsold inventory in Kinnelon is down from a year ago, Fisher reports, and sales are up and the projected absorption has gone from 18 months down to 9 months.

All this indicates that buyers are beginning to re-enter the housing market, and now is still a good time to buy while there is plenty of inventory and prices are still relatively low.

That’s all for today’s regional report. Be sure to check back for the latest report on your area.

Published: April 11, 2008

Good Signs as Mortgage applications Rise!
Posted on: Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Filed Under: National Real Estate News

Today Reuters reports that mortgage applications are up as the FHA index climbs more. This was released this morning by the Boston Globe and represents one of the first times in a while we have seen such a dramatic increase in Year-to-Year increases in mortgage applications. Buyers in the market should be aware that if they are thinking about making an offer the time to move is now before the summer competition gets too fierce, as tends to happen in the Boston real estate market.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Applications for U.S. home mortgages jumped last week, fueled by the ongoing increase in activity for government-backed loan programs, according to data published by an industry group on Wednesday.

The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage application activity rose 5.4 percent to 725.6 in the week ended April 4. A year earlier the index stood at 646.6.

The MBA’s index of refinancing applications last week rose 3.4 percent to 2,724.7, and its gauge of loan requests for home purchases climbed 8.1 percent to 384.7.

The sub-index of applications for loans backed by government programs such as the Federal Housing Administration and the Veterans Administration jumped by 12.9 percent last week, bringing the measure to 375.2, nearly three times the level of a year ago.

Borrowers have increasingly looked to FHA programs in recent months after lenders that once courted them have now closed or severely tightened requirements for getting a loan. The government has expanded the reach of the FHA for homeowners facing foreclosure, and key lawmakers are lobbying to broaden the programs even more.

Fixed 30-year mortgage rates averaged 5.78 percent in the week, up 0.03 percentage point from the prior week.

(Reporting by Al Yoon, editing by Walker Simon)

Update on: New Boston Roof Deck and Roof Access Requirements Implemented
Posted on: Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Filed Under: Boston Real Estate News

Please find below a update on the Roof Deck and Access requirements as done by our resident expert and legal adviser David Thomas, CEO of CityState LLC, a Boston area management and construction firm. For questions regarding this article please post your comments and David will answer them accordingly.

New Boston Roof Deck and Roof Access Requirements Implemented

By: David L. Thomas, Jr.

Are you legally permitted to occupy your roof deck? Have you sufficiently secured or alarmed your roof access? Condominium associations, apartment building owners and even individual unit owners must now answer these questions which have been raised by a new Boston ordinance which became effective in early March.

Is your roof deck legal?

Until the Boston Inspectional Services Department (ISD) issued its Bulletin implementing the ordinance, many residents were concerned that use of most roof decks in Boston would be rendered illegal. Fortunately, the Bulletin essentially defers the effective date of the roof deck provisions of the ordinance so that many if not most roof decks are still legal to occupy. The ordinance had required most roof decks to have a permit by the early March 2008 effective date of the ordinance, but ISD had not established the procedure for permitting roof decks under the ordinance and, even if it had, it could not possibly have issued permits for most roof decks by the effective date.

ISD’s Bulletin interprets and implements portions of this rather poorly drafted ordinance to make it more workable. The Bulletin creates a certification process which, like the similar one that has existed for many years for fire escapes, requires certification every five years. The deadline for initial certification of existing roof decks “previously permitted” through ISD is postponed by the Bulletin to June 30, 2009 at the earliest, or later depending on the Ward in which the building is located. The deadlines by Ward are:

Ward Deadline
1, 3, 5, 7, 9 June 30, 2009
2, 4, 6, 8, 10 June 30, 2010
11 through 15 June 30, 2011
16 through 22 June 30, 2012

Thus, roof decks built with a building permit are still legal to occupy under the new ordinance. Of course, they will need to obtain certification by the applicable date in the ISD Bulletin. However, roof decks which were not built in accordance with a validly issued building permit are now illegal to occupy and must be closed off by a locked or alarmed door or hatchway in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance until they are brought into compliance.

One conundrum is that many owners or condominium boards may not know if their roof deck was built with a permit. If, for example, a roof deck was built at the time of a substantial renovation of a building, the permit itself may not be clear as to whether the roof deck was part of the permitted project. The plans submitted for the building permit may be difficult to access or it may be difficult to tell from the plans whether the roof deck was included in the project or built as specified. This may particularly be the case with older roof decks.

Certain roof decks are excluded from the certification requirement by the Bulletin. These include roof decks on owner-occupied one and two family structures and roof decks accessed through a single access point within owner-occupied units in larger buildings. Note that if a structure or unit ceases to be owner-occupied, any roof deck ceases to be legal if otherwise required to be certified.

Roof access restrictions

The ordinance requires that certain access points to roofs with illegal roof decks or no roof deck be restricted by means of a lock, if legally permissible, or qualifying alarm device. Access points which must be secured or alarmed include any doorway, passageway, hatchway or staircase through which any occupant has unimpeded access to the roof or illegal roof deck from the interior of the building.

Securing roof access with a lock may raise fire egress issues, and thus a qualifying alarm often is the better approach. Such an alarm must sound whenever the access door is opened and may not substantially impede the opening and closing of the door. The alarm device must have signage on or near it to warn users of the presence of the alarm, and may be deactivated with a key, code or other measure as long as it is designed to reactivate itself automatically within a reasonable time.

Penalties and liability issues

Fines of $300 for the first offense and $500 for any subsequent offense are included in the ordinance. Moreover, while the ordinance expressly does not create a presumption of negligence if it is violated, the new requirements do create some additional liability risk for owners and condominium boards if an accident were to occur. A violation of the ordinance may also have some effect on liability insurance coverage under some policies.

All apartment building owners, all condominium and cooperative associations, and individual unit owners who rent out units with private roof decks should determine immediately whether any roof deck to which occupants have access is legal to occupy or whether any roof access point needs to be secured by a lock or alarmed. Failure to do so and take appropriate action could have dire consequences.

Mr. Thomas is an attorney and CEO of CityState LLC, a Boston area property management firm.

5 homeownership tax myths
Posted on: Monday, March 31, 2008

Filed Under: National Real Estate News

For those of you looking for tax breaks when buying a home check out this article by Kay Bell, freelance writer with Bankrate.com. Owning a home can be a great benefit but make sure you know all you need to know before diving in blindly.

By Kay Bell

Owning a home tops the dream list for most Americans, and for plenty of good reasons. It’s a shelter for your family, a gathering place for your friends and a good long-term investment.

Tax breaks are also frequently cited as motivation for moving from renting to owning, and there are many ways a home can cut your tax bill.

But, as is often the case with the U.S. tax code, homeownership tax benefits are not always clear-cut. That frequently leads to some bad information floating around.

While myths, half-truths and misconceptions may abound, we’ve narrowed it down to five that, if you buy into them, could cost you.

1. My mortgage interest will reduce my tax bill.
This is true for the majority of homeowners, but not for all. And this tax break won’t work forever.

To take tax advantage of your home loan’s interest, you must itemize and come up with a total that exceeds your standard amount. On 2007 tax returns, the standard deductions are $5,350 for single taxpayers, $7,850 for head of household filers and $10,700 for married couples who file jointly. These amounts increase a bit each year to account for inflation.

“Given home prices these days, most owners are itemizing,” says Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst with CCH Inc. of Riverwoods, Ill. By the time they count mortgage interest, property taxes and other nonhome deductions, such as state taxes and charitable gifts, their itemized totals easily surpass their allowable standard deductions.

But most is not all.

Taxpayers who buy a home late in the year, for instance, might find the standard deduction is more beneficial, at least initially, says Kathy Tollaksen, a CPA at Sikich LLP in Aurora, Ill. In these cases, where you make only a few payments in a tax year, depending on your loan you might not pay much interest, at least not enough to exceed standard amounts.

Timing also could reduce or eliminate other home-related tax breaks.

“Quite a few states have real estate taxes that are calculated in arrears. That is, they have already been paid or mostly paid (by the seller) by the time you buy,” says Tollaksen. “In the first year, you’re seeing taxes that are someone else’s responsibility so you’re not getting the full tax value of your real estate taxes.”

The benefit of mortgage interest also could be a myth if you’ve lived in your home for a long time. In this case, you likely are paying more toward your loan’s principal instead of interest. So homeowners at the end of a loan term don’t get much, if any, from this tax break.

Or, as Bob D. Scharin, senior tax analyst and editor of Warren, Gorham & Lamont/RIA’s monthly tax journal “Practical Tax Strategies,” puts it, “Every deductible expense you incur may not produce a deduction.”

2. All costs related to my home are deductible.
There are no two ways about this one. It’s flat-out false.

“Some buyers think, hope, they can write off everything connected with the house,” says Tollaksen. “Not so. Association fees and property insurance costs are not deductible.”

Neither, in most cases, is private mortgage insurance, which your lender probably required if your down payment was less than 20 percent. However, a new law changes the deductibility of PMI for mortgages originated or refinanced between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2009.

If you got your mortgage and policy in that time frame, you might be able to deduct your insurance premium payments. The law also extends beyond private insurance to others, including FHA, VA and rural housing.

There are some limits, though. The PMI deduction is phased out for taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes exceeding $100,000 and is totally elimitnated once AGI reaches $110,000.

Don’t try to deduct basic maintenance, repair or home improvement costs either.

Tollaksen says, “I’ve had people say, ‘I put a new roof on my home; can I deduct that?’ No.”

If you try to write off these expenses, expect to hear from the Internal Revenue Service and to pay a higher tax bill (and possible penalties and interest) after you refigure your taxes without the disallowed deductions.

However, you still need to keep track of these expenses.

“If you convert the home to rental property or sell it,” she says, “these costs will affect the property’s tax basis.”

A home’s basis is critical when it comes time to sell. And selling is also a tax area in which many people fall for myth No. 3.

3. I must use money from my home sale to buy another residence.
This used to be the only way to get around a tax bill on a home sale. Even then, you were only able to defer taxes by purchasing a new residence of equal or greater value with the profits from your other house. When you sold your final house, you’d owe those long-deferred taxes you had rolled over throughout the years. Home sellers age 55 or older were allowed a once-in-a-lifetime tax exemption of up to $125,000 in sale profit.

But on May 7, 1997, home-sale tax law changed. Still, almost a decade later, many homeowners are confused about the tax implications of selling.

“I recently heard some neighbors talking about having to buy another house when they sell to avoid the taxes,” says Scharin. “If the last time you sold the house was before 1997, you’re thinking of those old rules.”

Don’t worry. Most taxpayers still get a nice break. Now, if you live in the house for two of the five years before you sell, the IRS won’t collect tax on sale profit of up to $250,000 if you’re single or $500,000 if you and your spouse file a joint return.

“The law change has really affected people’s behavior,” says Luscombe. “Before, it didn’t really matter much whether you sold frequently or held onto your home for a long term. You, basically, could roll over the gain into a larger home and people could avoid tax until they sold for the final time without putting it into a replacement home.

“Now the law rewards people who sell frequently. In this current market, people who sell every couple of years can get and keep their gain,” Luscombe says. “But people who buy and hold might find they have reached the point where the gain exceeds the exclusion.”

That means they face unexpectedly high tax bills, even at the lower 15-percent capital gains rate. The profit could also push them into a higher overall tax bracket, meaning they would make too much to claim some deductions, credits or exemptions. They also might even end up owing alternative minimum tax.

Another problematic consequence, says Luscombe, is that when the new rules took effect, people basically quit keeping records related to their homes.

“They thought: Since we’re never going to be taxed on the sale, there’s no need to keep track of what we paid and what improvements we made,” he says. The improvements add to your home’s basis, which you subtract from the sale price to determine your profit and whether any of it is taxable.

“Now with inflation in the housing market, a lot of people are selling homes in excess of the gains without any way to show that their tax bill should be less,” says Luscombe.

4. Putting my child on my home’s title is a smart tax move.
Worries about taxes on a residence sometimes lead homeowners to fall for this myth. It’s a particularly tricky one, because it combines confusion about residential taxes with the even more complex estate-tax area.

“Sometimes we’ll hear about taxpayers who, in doing some quick back-of-the-envelope estate planning, decide to put their home in the children’s names,” says Tollaksen. “The thinking is: My son or daughter won’t have to worry about this when I die.”

The goals: Avoid probate, keep the home in the family and get the property out of the parent’s estate for those tax purposes. Such a move, however, could produce other tax problems for your children.

Unless the child moves into the newly deeded house with the parent and lives there long enough (two of the previous five years) to make the house the child’s main residence, too, says Tollaksen, the son or daughter won’t get the $250,000 or $500,000 residential tax break when the child later decides to sell. Without establishing primary residency in the house, either before or after the parent passes away, the child’s ownership is viewed as an investment property.

Other parents opt to simply add a child’s name along with theirs on the title to the house, known legally as a joint tenancy. It doesn’t mean that all the owners live in the home, but simply that two or more people hold title to the property.

This, too, can produce tax complications.

Generally, when someone inherits a property, its value is stepped up. That means when the owner dies, the property becomes worth its fair market value that day.

But if the child co-owns the property with his parent, the child doesn’t get to fully use stepped-up basis. Tax law considers the addition of the child’s name to the title as a gift. And, along with that half of the home, the child receives half the basis that his or her parent has in the property.

This is known as the property’s carry-over basis. And it could be costly.

Consider, for example, that you bought your house many years ago and your basis in the property is $50,000. You add your daughter to the title. When you die, she inherits your half of the home, which by then is worth $250,000. A buyer offers $300,000 for the home.

Pretty good deal, right? From a real estate perspective, yes. But not when it comes to your daughter’s tax bill on the sale.

What had been done with the best parental intention turned out to carry a big price because of this homeownership tax myth.

5. If I take a capital loss when I sell my home, I can write it off.
This myth, like No. 2, was probably started by wishful homeowners. Sorry, it’s just as wrong.

It is true that real estate, like any other asset, has the potential to go down as well as up in value. But unlike most of those other holdings, you cannot write off any loss you suffer if you must sell your main residence for less than what you paid.

That’s because your residence, under tax law, is considered personal property.

“When you sell your home for a loss, it’s not like other capital items,” says Scharin. “You don’t get to deduct personal property that you sell for a loss.”

“It’s the same as any personal property that declines in value,” says Luscombe, “like that old TV you sold to the neighbor kid so he could take it to college. You sold it for much less than you paid, but you can’t take a loss.”

You do, however, have to pay tax on gains you make when selling personal property.

But at least you now know the difference between fact and fiction when it comes to your residential property, which will help you make appropriate real estate and tax decisions in the future.

Freelance writer Kay Bell writes Bankrate’s tax stories from her Austin, Texas, home. She also writes two tax blogs, Bankrate’s Eye on the IRS, and Don’t Mess With Taxes.

Spring has Sprung on the Boston real estate market. Are you ready to market your home for sale?
Posted on: Friday, March 28, 2008

Filed Under: National Real Estate News

The spring real estate market is upon us in Boston. As things heat up those of you attempting to sell your property may want to review some great tips recently released by RISMedia, a source for information for real estate professionals, brought to them from the Jenson Group of Las Vegas.

RISMEDIA, March 28, 2008-Most sellers have an emotional connection to their home and feel it deserves top dollar when being sold. Everyone naturally wants to get the most money for his or her product, but “sellers must not be hasty with this all-important decision,” cautions real estate expert Robert Jenson, founder and CEO of The Jenson Group. “Indeed, the most common mistake that causes sellers to get less than they hope for is listing the sale price too high.”

Jenson notes, “Listings reach the greatest proportion of potential buyers within the initial days and weeks after hitting the market. If a property is overpriced early on, it will be dismissed - or outright missed - by prospective buyers and may result in price reductions that will reflect poorly on the listing. Overpriced properties languish on the market, and most end up selling at a lower price than would have been realized had it been priced properly in the first place.”

To help would-be sellers foster maximum profits with their real estate transaction, Jenson offers these insights on the various elements that must be considered when establishing a fair, competitive and marketable sale price for a home:

  1. Square footage: Total square footage is an important consideration when establishing a home’s sale price, but this is usually just a starting point for buyers who will use it to narrow down the field, but make an actual purchase decision based on many other factors. There are some general rules of thumb to know when considering a home’s price per square foot, such as smaller homes generally get a higher price/foot than large homes, and single stories will sell for a higher price/foot than a two story.
  2. Location within community: Homes that back up to a busy street get, on average, 10-20% less than homes elsewhere in a neighborhood. Anticipate this type of obstacle and factor it into the original sale price to avoid inevitable price reductions down the road, which reflect poorly on the listing and will likely cause it to sell at a lower price than would have been realized had it been priced properly at the onset. Quiet cul-de sacs, golf or water frontage, lots that offer privacy are value adds that can certainly justify a higher sale price than other homes in a community - or be leveraged as an advantage against competing listings.
  3. Views…or lack thereof: Whether it is the ocean, a downtown skyline, the mountains, water or some other desirable landscape, buyers are willing to pay a premium for views and a home should be priced accordingly. Just be realistic. A view that can only be had by standing on the counter from the second story looking out the window to the left simply doesn’t count, and it’s inadvisable to dupe a prospective buyer by adding this to the listing’s MLS description.
  4. Upgrades and features: It’s a simple formula: upgrades = sold. For a home to sell quickly and for the price desired, it must be “finished” with as many structural and interior design upgrades as possible…and nothing’s too small to leverage in establishing a home’s price point. From crown molding to faux paining to door handles and cabinet handles/knobs with modern finishes, to more obvious upgrades such as appliances, window, counter, cabinet and floor treatments, to swimming pools and surround sound wiring…any functional or beautification enhancement to a home are considerations in establishing its true value and strategic sale price.
  5. Community amenities: Guard-gated communities or those with amenities such as a clubhouse, swimming pool and/or fitness center are also elements that often raise a home’s price per square foot. When pricing a home without these benefits, know whether you are competing against other homes that do offer such value adds so that you can price your home as aggressively and competitively as possible.
  6. Comparable sales: Price your home referencing sold comparables -price per square footage of other homes that have already sold in your community - up to 3-months old maximum, as looking beyond 3-months is simply not a realistic portrayal of current market conditions and may steer you in a wrong direction. It’s also as important to compare your listing to active competing listings - homes currently for sale, which is the best tool for honing an effective pricing strategy - particularly for highly motivated sellers.
  7. Professional appraisal: Sellers often frown on the idea of paying for an appraisal before there’s even an offer on the table, but doing so is actually one of the most important things a seller can do in pricing a home relative to current market conditions. Want to sell the home quickly? Price it at or below the appraised value as buyers are educated, are shopping deals, and will recognize your fair price and be more apt to pay it with less haggling.
  8. Current mortgage conditions: The current mortgage market has tightened its proverbial belt and many lenders now require higher credit scores coupled with higher down payments, which can cash strap a buyer who will most definitely be holding out for the best deal possible. Every seller naturally wants to get the most money for his or her product, but a savvy seller will understand the mortgage industry’s impact on the buyer and will price accordingly.

For expert advice from a local Boston Realtor send us an email at Info@BostonRealEstate.net and we would be pleased to speak with you about the best ways to market your home in todays real estate climate.

Curt Shilling’s home hits the market for $8M
Posted on: Thursday, March 27, 2008

Filed Under: Boston Real Estate News

For those of you that missed the news, here is the article ERA Boston Real Estate Group was featured in from the Boston Herald today.

Only $8M for best Red Sox souvenir ever

By Gayle Fee and Laura Raposa   |   Thursday, March 27, 2008  |  http://www.bostonherald.com  |  The Inside Track

Housing crash? What crash???

Red Sox hurler Curt Schilling just put his marvy Medfield manse on the market yesterday for a whopping $8 million - some $3.5 million more than he paid for it back in 2003.

Schilling and his wife, Shonda, who first announced they were selling the house last fall (before No. 38 signed a one-year extension with the Sox), finally listed their 20-room Colonial on 25-plus acres yesterday.
Boston Luxury Homes

The 11,000-square-foot, three-story house with attached eight-car garage, is assessed for $3.9 million. The Schillings bought it from former New England Patriot Drew Bledsoe for $4.5 million. Bledsoe had originally listed the property at $9 million.

“It’s a fabulous house but it’s not the house we want to live in for the rest of our lives,” Shonda told us last fall. “I’d really like to be in a neighborhood for the kids. And we know it’s not going to sell in a week so we thought we’d put it on the market now and see what happens.”

According to Rob Bergeron, who moves high-end Back Bay and Beacon Hill property for the ERA Boston Real Estate Group, the current housing slump hasn’t affected high-end properties the same way it has the rest of the market.
Boston Real Estate

“In the last six months or so the luxury home market has continued to do well compared with the rest of the market,” he said. “Homes at these price points typically stay on the market longer due to the limited buyer pool, but homes that are priced appropriately are still typically moving in less than 90 days.”

Bergeron said the $3.5 million appreciation the Schillings have placed on their manse far exceeds the rest of the market, which has gone up about 25 percent since 2003.

“But the celebrity status of the seller brings special pros and cons to the property and it will be interesting to see how it affects the sale,” he said.

The house is fit for a sports king with seven bedrooms, heated swimming pool, an all-sports court (tennis, basketball, skating rink and a professional batting cage), a game room and home theater. But we’re rather taken with little Grant Schilling’s World Series-themed bedroom!

Refi’s up 82% and loan application volume up 48.1% in the US
Posted on: Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Filed Under: National Real Estate News

After a slow February in Boston where residential sales were down significantly compared to February in 2007, activity has started to pick up significantly. The Boston condo market will get a shot in the arm as the rate changes and conforming loan limits improve across the nation. Here is the report published today by Mortgage Bankers Association.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (March 26, 2008) — The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) today released its Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending March 21, 2008.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, was 965.9, an increase of 48.1 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from 652.0 one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 46.1 percent compared with the previous week and was up 41.1 percent compared with the same week one year earlier.

The Refinance Index increased 82.2 percent to 4255.2 from 2335.2 the previous week and the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 10.6 percent to 403.7 from 365.0 one week earlier.  The Conventional Purchase Index increased 10.7 percent while the Government Purchase Index (largely FHA) increased 10.1 percent. On an unadjusted basis, the Purchase Index increased 10.4 percent to 449.2 from 406.9 the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Conventional Index increased 54.3 percent to 1310.4 from 849.0 the previous week, and the seasonally adjusted Government Index increased 21.1 percent to 391.7 from 323.5 the previous week.

“The Federal Reserve acted last week to bring some stability to the mortgage-backed securities market and we saw an immediate impact with a drop in mortgage rates.  With a drop in the 30-year fixed rate of at least a quarter of a point, we saw a sharp increase in refinance applications, but applications for home purchases also increased over where they have been the last few weeks, although still below where they were this time last year,” said Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics.

The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 11.3 percent to 743.6 from 668.4.  The four week moving average is up 3.1 percent to 375.2 from 363.8 for the Purchase Index, while this average is up 18.3 percent to 2901.9 from 2452.8 for the Refinance Index.

The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 62.0 percent of total applications from 49.7 percent the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 3.8 from 7.9 percent of total applications from the previous week.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 5.74 percent from 5.98 percent, with points increasing to 1.13 from 0.90 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans.

The average contract interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 5.23 percent from 5.24 percent, with points increasing to 1.15 from 0.97 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans.

The average contract interest rate for one-year ARMs increased to 7.02 percent from 6.99 percent, with points increasing to 1.71 from 1.64 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans.

**SPECIAL NOTES**

The survey covers approximately 50 percent of all U.S. retail residential mortgage applications, and has been conducted weekly since 1990.  Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts.  Base period and value for all indexes is March 16, 1990=100.